You think this is creepy? ---> TRY SEARCHING "T.REX"
1.JP raptors are monsters.
2.Some of the wrong deviations are wrong because of "details" (like feathers attached to the wrist, but no to the second finger).
3.Real Velociraptor here

4.I'm not criticizing art, just scientific accuracy, so please don't get offended.
5.I do not own the art above, all belong to their respective owners and can be found by DA-searching "Velociraptor" and viewing the first page.
6.Meme based in
[link]7.Again: this is not intended to offend anybody. If you keep searching a couple of pages more, you'll find my first Velociraptor paintings, wich are wrong, too.
****This was a message from The Feather Nazis: All Hail the Accuracy!****
Based on that, the 1st check marked Velociraptor should be crossed out for having a protobeak (Don't get me wrong, though, as it's actually 1 of my favorites & otherwise accurate).
BTW, that's some good dark humor at the end of this deviation.
Q: What right have you to call other works inaccurate?
A: I need permission to evaluate the anatomy of those specimens? No.
"Some of the very best works on here are inaccurate."
Paleontography (paleoart) isn't just art. In fact, most of the value is on the science you put in the drawing. So, in a strict point of view, they're not good works (even if the artistic vision is flawless).
And there are some wonderful speculative raptor-like (artistic, creative)depictions. Example: [link]
Sorry if you think I was a bit aggressive, as a dinosaur nerd this is my opinion.
I love the creative realistic ones, they're badass. But theres a place in my heart for creative goofy cartoon animals too. Theyre just as imaginative, just in a different way.