Hmm,critique.It will be my second critique. It wont be really good maybe, i'm sorry And also, my english is not perfect too.So i can make mistakes.
Positives: *Looks like very fast. It could be very handy in battlefields *Amazing tank for a leader. *It appeals to the eye, and very aesthetic. It's colors are very original too. *Your style and coloring are very cool.
Negatives: (i couldn't find a negative thing, really i didn't, but i must say something. So i'll try write some negative things...) *Right-up corner shouldn't be like this. *I think,you should add a secondary weapon. *I didn't understand it is symmetrical,or it is not. You should draw it's front side too.
Pretty cool design, but from studying military equipment and vehicles, I'll just put a few positives and negatives
Positives: -Looks pretty cool, like something you'd see in cartoons or comics. -Seems pretty good off road -Gun depression seems okay. -Pretty good visibility for the commander/driver and gunner. -Cannon seems like a high velocity one, making it a good sniper -Seems pretty good for urban areas or the military police role -Engine seems to be be in the center, meaning from a head on attack, the tank won't necessarily burn or explode when hit, giving the crew members a chance to get out
Negatives: -High profile, which means it can be spotted and targeted from long distances -Too many weak spots, especially the center, the tracks, and radio in the back. -Doesn't seem to hold as much shells due to the limited space -Crew members seem way to vulnerable due to them being visible (even if the window is bullet proof, on a tank vs tank situation, if hit, high chance crew doesn't make it) -Turret seems like a giant target -Not much angled armor, which means a shell will always penetrate since the armor seems as smooth as a Porsche -Engine in the center, if it gets hit in the side, you destroy the tank and kill the crew. -Cannon seems to be limited when aiming up. -Co axel gun seems way to high, should always be close to the cannon, so when marking a target or eliminating enemy infantry, it's easier to use and aim.
Hope this helped in case you start designing any other military vehicles. c:
Good political judgement on that part at least, good to hear it. I don't think anyone would expect you personally to invade the Falklands...
Brazil or Chile? Not really anything to do with them... Chile is historically a friend of the UK in such crises so I don't think you need to mention them in this context. Britain is definitely not weak with regard to military capability in comparison with any potential South American adversaries (certainly not Chile and not Brazil) and has a military which has progressed leaps and bounds in capability whereas any South American potential enemy is still equipped with 80s era equipment and potential. Britain's carrier-based expression of power is currently definitely weak but that would be addressed quickly if the need ever arose. Hopefully it will never be needed again.
Thank you for the critique. It is always welcome when somebody takes the time to point both positive and negative aspects. btw, it is not symmetrical. think of a crane: at the left the cockpit, and at the right a cannon instead of the crane arm. I'd like to have the time to make a 3D model of it.