Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
March 8, 2012
Image Size
331 KB
Resolution
1076×673
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,067 (2 today)
Favourites
55 (who?)
Comments
35
Downloads
45
×
Argentinean Light Attack Tank by ChrisMasna Argentinean Light Attack Tank by ChrisMasna
I'm seriously planning to invade Uruguay.


Just practising organic shapes and concepts in futuristic militar vehicles. (And I was kidding, I have nothing against Uruguay).
Add a Comment:
 
:iconaliskus:
Hmm,critique.It will be my second critique. It wont be really good maybe, i'm sorry ;) And also, my english is not perfect too.So i can make mistakes.

Positives:
*Looks like very fast. It could be very handy in battlefields ;)
*Amazing tank for a leader.
*It appeals to the eye, and very aesthetic. It's colors are very original too.
*Your style and coloring are very cool.

Negatives:
(i couldn't find a negative thing, really i didn't, but i must say something. So i'll try write some negative things...)
*Right-up corner shouldn't be like this.
*I think,you should add a secondary weapon.
*I didn't understand it is symmetrical,or it is not. You should draw it's front side too.
What do you think?
The Artist thought this was FAIR
4 out of 4 deviants thought this was fair.

:iconunknownmarksman115:
Pretty cool design, but from studying military equipment and vehicles, I'll just put a few positives and negatives

Positives:
-Looks pretty cool, like something you'd see in cartoons or comics.
-Seems pretty good off road
-Gun depression seems okay.
-Pretty good visibility for the commander/driver and gunner.
-Cannon seems like a high velocity one, making it a good sniper
-Seems pretty good for urban areas or the military police role
-Engine seems to be be in the center, meaning from a head on attack, the tank won't necessarily burn or explode when hit, giving the crew members a chance to get out

Negatives:
-High profile, which means it can be spotted and targeted from long distances
-Too many weak spots, especially the center, the tracks, and radio in the back.
-Doesn't seem to hold as much shells due to the limited space
-Crew members seem way to vulnerable due to them being visible (even if the window is bullet proof, on a tank vs tank situation, if hit, high chance crew doesn't make it)
-Turret seems like a giant target
-Not much angled armor, which means a shell will always penetrate since the armor seems as smooth as a Porsche
-Engine in the center, if it gets hit in the side, you destroy the tank and kill the crew.
-Cannon seems to be limited when aiming up.
-Co axel gun seems way to high, should always be close to the cannon, so when marking a target or eliminating enemy infantry, it's easier to use and aim.


Hope this helped in case you start designing any other military vehicles. c:
What do you think?
The Artist thought this was FAIR
4 out of 4 deviants thought this was fair.

The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork

Please sign up or login to post a critique.

:iconyereverluvinuncleber:
yereverluvinuncleber Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014
You could try the Falklands again. We'd soon have lots of bits of these for the 'scrap dealers' to start selling.
Reply
:iconchrismasna:
ChrisMasna Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014
Why would I want to do that? I support the autodetermination principle, so if the kelpers who are like a 6th gen living there don't want to be a province of Argentina, nobody should force them.

On the other hand, the UK base would be anhilated if Brazil or Chile put a foot on the islands, so not so fast, UK is really far a and relatively weak.
Reply
:iconyereverluvinuncleber:
yereverluvinuncleber Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014
Good political judgement on that part at least, good to hear it. I don't think anyone would expect you personally to invade the Falklands...

Brazil or Chile? Not really anything to do with them... Chile is historically a friend of the UK in such crises so I don't think you need to mention them in this context. Britain is definitely not weak with regard to military capability in comparison with any potential South American adversaries (certainly not Chile and not Brazil) and has a military which has progressed leaps and bounds in capability whereas any South American potential enemy is still equipped with 80s era equipment and potential. Britain's carrier-based expression of power is currently definitely weak but that would be addressed quickly if the need ever arose. Hopefully it will never be needed again.
Reply
:iconaliskus:
Aliskus Featured By Owner Aug 1, 2012
Thanx for accepting that ;) By the way,this tank is engineering marvel!
Reply
:iconchrismasna:
ChrisMasna Featured By Owner Aug 1, 2012
Thank you for the critique. It is always welcome when somebody takes the time to point both positive and negative aspects. :)
btw, it is not symmetrical. think of a crane: at the left the cockpit, and at the right a cannon instead of the crane arm.
I'd like to have the time to make a 3D model of it.
Reply
:iconaliskus:
Aliskus Featured By Owner Aug 1, 2012
Ok,i knew it.Understanded.
Reply
:iconenc86:
enc86 Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2012
awesome work, this looks awesome!
Reply
:iconchrismasna:
ChrisMasna Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2012
Thanks!
Reply
:iconbdeatcher:
Bdeatcher Featured By Owner Mar 24, 2012  Hobbyist Interface Designer
STARFOX!!!!......WHAAAAAAT, This is off the chain bro!
Reply
:iconskoshi8:
Skoshi8 Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
So the Malvinas are on hold for now?
Reply
Add a Comment: